Assessment of dental, skeletal, and soft tissue changes following mandibular advancement with Invisalign in skeletal Class II.

Objective: This study evaluated the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes for Class II malocclusion patients treated with Invisalign clear aligners with mandibular wings (IAMW). Methods: This retrospective study included 50 skeletal Class II patients treated with Invisalign clear aligner with mandibular wings. Records of 20 subjects were collected from the AAOF Legacy Collection (The Case Western Bolton Brush Growth Study) and were used as a control. The dental, skeletal, and facial soft tissue changes were assessed by digitizing and analyzing lateral cephalograms using Dolphin Imaging software (version 11.95 Premium; Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif). Paired t-tests and independent t-tests were used to assess the changes before and after and to compare between the IAMW and control groups. Results: The different measurements of the maxilla have shown that IAMW effect on the maxilla included minimal, non-significant retraction compared to the control group. The SNB and mandibular base position increased by 1.17° (±2.63) and 3.79 (±8.13), respectively. The mandible advanced significantly in the treatment group compared to the control group. Dentally, the lower incisors tipped slightly buccally, but the change was not significant (p > 0.05). The facial convexity angle decreased by 1.16° (±4.36). Conclusion: Invisalign clear aligner with mandibular advancer wings was able to correct the Class II malocclusion. This correction was mainly skeletal with some dental changes. This device can be used to address the growth modification problem in Class II malocclusion at the same time as addressing the other occlusal problems.

Association among craniofacial morphology, ethnicity, and risk of pediatric sleep-related breathing disorders: A multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Craniofacial morphology and ethnicity may be risk factors for sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD) in children but have not yet been assessed in an international multicenter study. The objectives of this study were to assess the association among craniofacial features, self-reported ethnicity, and risk of SRBD in children undergoing orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Children aged 5-18 years who presented for orthodontic evaluation were enrolled in the United States, South Africa, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Japan. The risk of SRBD was defined as answering ≥0.33 positive responses to the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire. Craniofacial features included measurements in sagittal and vertical dimensions to evaluate the cranial base, maxillomandibular and dental relationships, and nasopharyngeal airway dimensions. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association among craniofacial features, ethnicity, age, body mass index, and risk of SRBD. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 602 patients from 5 sites. A total of 76 patients (12.6%) had a risk of SRBD. The mean age was 12.5 years. Male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-3.4; P = 0.041), Middle Eastern ethnicity (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 4.1-25.4; P = 0.001), body mass index (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; P = 0.001), gonial angle (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98; P = 0.011), and inferiorly positioned hyoid (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; P = 0.002) were significantly associated with the risk of SRBD. CONCLUSIONS: In an ambidirectional cohort study across 5 sites, male gender, Middle Eastern ethnicity, body mass index, gonial angle, and inferiorly positioned hyoid were associated with the risk of SRBD in children undergoing orthodontic treatment.

Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment among patients and parents in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: The decision to pursue orthodontic treatment is influenced by a variety of cosmetic, functional, and social reasons. This study compared the factors that influence adults' decisions before orthodontic treatment versus parents' decisions prior to their children's orthodontic treatment in Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the patients of orthodontic clinics of King Abdulaziz University in addition to a private orthodontic clinic in Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. The survey consisted of two versions of a questionnaire: one for adults and one for children's parents. The survey inquired about the participants' demographics, factors that led to the necessity of treatment, and considerations before opting for orthodontic treatment. The factors influencing the decision-making process of adults were compared to that of parents using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 417 subjects participated, 331 adults and 86 parents. The majority of the respondents in both groups were females. When compared to children, adults were more aware of the necessity for orthodontic treatment (78.5% of adults vs. 41.9% of children). The primary motivation for adults and parents to begin orthodontic treatment was to improve their esthetic appearance (58.6% and 87.2%), whereas functional concerns were less frequently reported (12.1% and 15.1%). Adults relied on less trustworthy sources of information about orthodontic treatment options, whereas parents relied on more dependable sources. CONCLUSIONS: The main reason for opting for orthodontic treatment in Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia was esthetic for both adults and children.